Dear writer #467099 Please, based on the Community Health Needs Assessment Scholarly Paper ( order #82652016) AND Community Health Needs Education/Implementation Strategy Paper ( Order # 82655580) Create a presentation based on the community health needs assessment assignments including the three top health concerns, goals and strategies. The presentation format should be creative and fun. PowerPoint format 6 slides, not including title slide or reference slide ( APA format) Grades will be based on creativity, construction, and content GRADING RUBRIC PRESENTATION Content Organization and Completeness Critical Thinking Writing 5. The writer has an excellent grasp of the content and elaborates fully on the points that are made, and provides comments and new information that contribute to furthering the topic. Gives illustrations and examples. 5. The writings are very well organized and ideas and information are true and supported well by the readings and connected to the question or the issue. Statements and ideas flow from/to one another. Ideas that support one another are connected. 5. The writing /discussion shows much careful thought and much insight gained about the issue at hand. The writer is able to pose original, interesting questions about the issue(s). Thoughts and conclusions are supported with good reasons. 5. The writing is lively, expressive, and engaging. Word choice is precise and rich. Sentences flow nicely. There are no errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. 3. The writer has a moderate grasp of the content but there are some misunderstandings on the points that are made, and minimal information that contributes to furthering the topic. 3. The writings are moderately organized and make sense and some ideas an information is true and supported by the readings and connected to the question or the issue. Statements and ideas flow from/to one another and are somewhat connected. 3. The writing /discussion show some careful thought and insight about most of, but not all issues are fully engaged, and insights could stand more development Thoughts and discussions/conclusions could be better supported from the readings. 3. The writings /discussions are pleasant, acceptable and mostly mechanically correct, but there may still be typos and spelling errors that interfere with the reading. 1. The writer has only a superficial or fuzzy understanding of the content. There are a number of misunderstandings or false claims that do not contribute to furthering the topic. 1. The writings lack a coherent structure and statements and ideas do not flow smoothly from /to one another. 1. Not much thought went into the writings /discussions and lack interesting or significant insights and conclusions/ideas are not well supported from the readings. 1. Sentences are choppy, incomplete, rambling, or awkward, or there may be many spelling typos or errors. Ideas are difficult to comprehend without rereading.
