*‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍* use very simple words dont write professional write essay language dont use big words. follow the info dont skip anything use only the article that i send u** **you use examples that show you are engaging with concepts and content from the module, but your argumentation should not be unclear and needs work on sophistication of ideas and explanations.** PLEASE READ THE INOF VERY VERY CAREFULLY!! AND DO EXACT SAME THING AS THE QUESTIONS ASK U TO DO AND DONT DONT SKIP ANY PART OF IT!!! and we should use read the Written Dialogue info that i send very carefully! You need to cite it You need use quote and cite it and have reference page and when U use quote highlight in the PDF and send me as well One of the challenges of academic writing is learning how to express complex ideas in language that is easy to understand. For this assignment, you get to play G.O.D. by composing a second dialogue along the lines of what Potter does in his book to approach the task below: Write a dialogue wherein you examine interpretivist social scientific explanations as a source of tension between Aboriginal peoples’ interpretations and those of the Canadian state or Enbridge in the pipeline issue. [Use Shannon McPhail’s chapter in The Answer is Still No as your case study] Proceed by composing your own dialogue with Socrates from ‘s point of view. Yo‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ur dialogue should be no more than 500 words [double-spaced, 11-pt Arial or 12-pt Times New Roman]. Submit as a doc or pdf only Your dialogue will be graded on: your effort to address the topic assigned the quality and depth of the content you submit demonstrated ability to connect dialogue to relevant concepts and issues from the assigned readings for this Module the presence of original thought, critical reflection and creativity timely posting of your dialogue [late submissions will be penalized 5% per day] Rubric Potter, G. (2017). Explanations of social scientific understanding and social scientific understandings of natural scientific explanations. In The philosophy of the social sciences: New perspectives (). New York: Routledge Coulthard, . (2014). For the land: The Dene nation’s struggle for self-determination. In Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition (). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bowles, P. and Veltmeyer, H. (Eds.) (2014). Shannon McPhail. In The answer is still no: Voices of pipeline resistance (88-102). Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing. The assignment is meant to be a dialogue that you write but it should be in the style of the Potter textbook. So, you are basing the format off of the textbook while writing your own dialogue. Does that he‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lp?